I'm looking for a way to do free hosting. But I mean free as in freedom, not free as in beer. Let me explain.
When I'm using a piece of free and open-source software such as OpenOffice.org, Evolution, or anything else, I have certain possibilities, freedoms if you will, of interacting with the software beyond just consuming it. I can look at the source code to study how it works. I can rebuild it to have a higher degree of confidence that I'm actually running that code. I can fix a bug or create an enhancement. I can send the patch upstream and wait for the next release, or in important cases I can create a local build. With the emerge of new project hosting sites such as GitHub, it's getting even easier to share one's modifications so others can use them. And so on.
As a lot of software moves to the web, how will this work in the future? There are those that say that it won't, and that it will be a big problem, and that's why you shouldn't use such services. Which is what probably a lot of free-software conscious users are doing right now. But I think that in the longer run, resisting isn't going to win over the masses to free software.
First of all, of course, the software would need to be written. So a free web office suite, a free web mail suite that matches the capabilities of the leading nonfree provider, and so on. We have good starts with Identi.ca and OpenStreetMap, for example, but we'd need a lot more. Then you throw it on a machine, and people can use it. Now as a user of this service, how do I get the source code? Of course you could offer a tarball for download, and that is the approach that the AGPL license takes. One problem with that is, if you are used to apt-get source or something similar for getting the source, everyone putting a tarball on their web site in a different place isn't going to make you happy. A standardized packaging-type thing ought to be wrapped around that. Another problem is that even if you trust the site's operator that that's the source code that's actually running on your site (even without malice, it could for example be outdated against the deployed version), it probably won't contain the local configuration files and setup scripts that would allow me to duplicate the service. And if I just want to study how the program is running in actuality, there is not much I can do.
Giving everyone SSH access to the box is probably not a good idea, and won't really solve all the issues anyway. In the future, when virtualization is standardized, ubiquitous, and awesome, one might imagine that a packaging of a web service won't be "put these files on the file system and reload a daemon" but instead "put these files and this configuration on that machine and activate it". This might give rise to a new generation of Linux "distributors". Getting the source tarball or "source package" might then involve getting a snapshot of that image, which you can examine, modify, and redeploy elsewhere. That could work for OpenStreetMap, for example, modulo the space and time required for their massive database. (But you might chose to fork only the code, not the data.) But it won't be easy to do the right thing in many cases, because with a web service, there is usually other people's data on the machine as well, which would need to be masked out or something. Maybe this really can't be done correctly, and the future will be more distributed, like in the way Jabber attempted to supplant centralized services such as ICQ. Distributed web mail makes sense, distributed OpenStreetMap perhaps less so.
Ideas anyone? Does anyone perhaps have experiences with running a web service that attempts to give users the freedoms and practical benefits that are usually associated with locally installed software?
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't know if this answers your question, but I find the Wikimedia foundation approach remarkable.
ReplyDeleteNot only everything is public (take a look at http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/), they even maintain their core software (MediaWiki) so that it is usable by third parties.
Of course it's unlikely that you will ever have the same scalability problems, but it's nice to know there is documentation on how to run a top-10 site "for real".
I recently spent some time trying to get a collection of java web applications deployed. In theory a .war or .ear with properly documented dependencies and setup scripts provided would be able to function on any J2EE compliant app server. Unfortunately, at least the projects I picked had failed to document and/or test sufficiently to make the code work elsewhere.
ReplyDeleteThe two biggest problems that I see in terms of installing someone else's service are data and configuration. You discuss configuration, but getting initial/sufficient data without getting all of the data is hard. I'm continually fighting with our developers at work about the appropriate location for data and trying to separate data from configuration.
Groups want to provide useful services. Taking it a step farther to provide a replicatable install involves significantly more work and documentation.
Try to follow this http://autonomo.us/ and the mailing list.
ReplyDelete